I had to blink twice when I saw today's Virtually Speaking
article by Dan Kusnetzky on ZDNet this morning:
Fusion-IO, flash cache and the importants of a good algorithm
My first reaction was to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that this was a cute way to abbreviate "important factors" in the interest of a shorter and snappier headline. Reading the article, however, convinced me that this was not the case. The appropriate word here would have been "importance;" but neither author nor editor (assuming there was one) seems to have caught this as an error to be corrected.
No comments:
Post a Comment