Today I shall probably be doing a piece on the first CD in Jonathan Biss’ project to record the complete piano sonatas of Ludwig van Beethoven. By way of “homework,” I decided to read Beethoven’s Shadow, which was released as a Kindle Single last month (in conjunction with Beethoven’s birthday). I do not have a Kindle; but Biss’ publicist provided me with a PDF review copy, which provided me with my most extended exercise in reading from the screen to date. (Printing the file was password-protected, not that I would have wanted to print that many pages.)
After completing this exercise I decided to see what else had been released as a Kindle Single. The Kindle Singles home page turned out to be a useful place to get an idea of both what was available and what was popular. When I read to the bottom of this page, I discovered that there was still a recommendations window, captioned:
Continue Shopping: Customers Who Bought Items in your Recent History Also Bought
This has never been anything other than a source of amusement; but, now that I am trying to use the site as a reference resource (supplementing my regular use of Grove Online, not to mention Wikipedia), I realized that I am probably throwing an even bigger monkey wrench into their recommendation algorithm than I had done when I was buying off-the-wall titles (both books and recordings).
Today’s top recommendation offered a curious blend of irony and nostalgia. It was John Cage’s Silence. The irony is that, in many respects, my experiences in reading this book (and, as a result of reading Leta Miller’s accounts of the early years of an avant-garde movement that involved Cage, Henry Cowell, and Lou Harrison, among many others, continuing to read it) did a lot to shape much of that off-the-wall browsing I have done on Amazon.com. In other words this is a classical example of how recommendation algorithms cannot tell the difference between co-occurrence and causality. The nostalgia has a somewhat ironic tinge as well, since I purchased my copy of Silence long before Amazon.com even existed!
No comments:
Post a Comment