Showing posts with label Scelsi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scelsi. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Diverse Vocal Techniques at ROOM Series

Last night at the Royce Gallery, Pamela Z presented her final ROOM Series concert for 2017, departing from her usual convention of offering these concerts only during the summer months. The title of the program was Tongue Teeth Lips, which meant to convey the different parts of the head that contribute to vocalizing. The selections presented a rich survey of non-standard approaches to the vocal genre. To offer as broad a survey as she could, Z invited as guest artists seven other pioneers in such non-standard techniques: Aurora Josephson, Amy Foote, Lorin Benedict, Richard Mix, Amy X Neuburg, Julie Queen, and Ron Heglin.

The result was about as broad a review of the full extent of vocalization as one could possibly desire. Indeed, I must confess that, since every selection was its own journey of discovery, I felt somewhat saturated by the time the intermission took place, which was after the first ten (of twenty) selections on the program. I chose to leave at that point, simply because I felt that I would not be able to keep any more in my head (and, for as long as I have been at this work, I have scrupulously followed D. T. Suzuki’s teachings, as passed on by John Cage, that prohibit taking notes).

The evening got off to a stimulating start with Z’s “Light on the Subject,” which was performed by the entire ensemble. Each of the invited vocalists stood beneath a bare electric light bulb. Z stood at a control panel at the rear beside a lamp with a single bulb. The control panel determined when which lights would go on and off. Each vocalist performed only when his/her bulb was lit (probably improvising). The piece began with single voices and gradually evolved into more elaborate fabrics when multiple lights were lit at the same time. The result evoked memories of the earliest emergence of counterpoint, but the execution itself was firmly fixed in the immediate present. Z then followed this with her own “Quatre Couches,” one of her pieces that integrates electronic response to gestures (for both control and synthesis) into her vocal delivery.

Of the ten selections in the first half, the most compelling was a solo taken by Lorin Benedict. I first encountered Benedict this past August when he performed in Ben Tinker’s concert series at Adobe Books. On that occasion he improvised on a tune by Irving Berlin to which he set a prodigious diversity of phonemes that could not be associated with any known language (not even Yiddish). Last night he gave a similar treatment to Jerome Kern’s “Nobody Else But Me;” and I began to appreciate the extent to which he had escalated scat singing far beyond its roots in jazz. Once again, any resemblance to any known language was purely coincidental; but Benedict’s melodic line could easily have been one of Charlie Parker’s most adventurous improvisations, so far out that even the most knowledgable listener would have trouble identifying the tune behind it. Equally compelling, but with no connotations of bebop, was Richard Mix’ performance of Giacinto Scelsi’s “Wo Ma,” also rooted in syllabic content but delivered through the warm tones of a deep bass voice.

Heglin’s performance also reflected on that same evening at Adobe, which he shared with Benedict. However, Heglin’s approach is purely spoken, resulting in what is sometimes called sound poetry. Simply put, Heglin composes his work strictly with phonemes, to the entire elimination of semantics and syntax. Nevertheless, there is a strong connotation of language in his performance, suggesting that a keen sense of rhetoric can be applied just as easily to “pure” phonemes as to the concepts behind logical argumentation. The result is that the attentive listener hangs on every word that Heglin utters, even when those “words” are no more than strings of nonsense syllables.

Two of the pieces were conceived more as ritual than as “music performance.” Amy Foote presented Danny Clay’s “no more darkness, no more night.” The program described this as “a ritual for the calling of the spirit of the beloved artist Hiram King ‘Hank’ Williams, who left this world in New Years Day, 1953.” The performance involved both a tape recorder (presumably playing a Williams track) and a stroked wine glass; but it was clear that the act of vocalizing was secondary (if not tertiary). The same could be said for Aurora Josephson’s “New Moon Intentions: a ritual,” which involved a far more diverse collection of objects, so numerous that the piece as a whole amounted to little more than setting them out and then putting them back.

The remaining selections on the first half tended to prioritize the theatrical. These included two Amy X Neuburg pieces, one of which brought together all of the vocalists, each presenting a different perspective on the same verbal phrase (“Today a Man”), and Julie Queen’s “Hatred of Sound,” which involved her trying to keep Josephson, Foote, and Neuburg quiet through gestures, each of which was noisy in its own silent way. These were all “idea” pieces whose cleverness tended to sustain beyond the attention span.

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Andrea Ceccomori’s Flute Recital at IIC

Yesterday evening the Italian Cultural Institute (Istituto Italiano de Cultura, IIC) hosted a solo recital by flutist Andrea Ceccomori. The title of the program was Una Bacchetta per la Pace (a baton for peace). This turned out to be the theme of his current world tour on behalf of an organization based in Assisi dedicated to the cause of world peace. At each stop on the tour, a handmade baton is presented to someone from that location on the basis of his own efforts toward that cause.

As had previously been announced, Ceccomori prepared a program that reflected on both the distant and the recent past. He began with a composition by Georg Philipp Telemann listed only as “fantasia.” Telemann actually wrote twelve fantasias for unaccompanied flute (TWV 40:2–13); but, for most listeners, being specific would not matter very much. The work was a multi-movement piece with a decidedly improvisatory spirit, somewhat in the sense of the keyboard toccatas of Johann Sebastian Bach.

Bach was also on the program but as part of a piece called “Bachiana.” This involved a performance of the Allemande movement from Bach’s only solo flute partita (BWV 1013 in A minor), which was followed by Ceccomori’s own invented elaboration on the content of that Allemande. Those who know the Bach source know that the Allemande, like many of his preludes, amounts to a study of “repetitive structures,” a term best associated with Philip Glass, who preferred it to “minimalism” in describing his work. However, Bach allowed his structures to advance through underlying harmonic progressions, while Glass tended to keep his underlying harmony fixed. Nevertheless, when Ceccomori turned to his own reflection on Bach’s Allemande, he seemed more occupied with this own approaches to repetition; and there were a few hints that he was familiar with at least some of Glass’ tropes.

That familiarity with Glass also seemed to surface in his five short pieces that concluded the program. However, Glass was not the only source of hints of familiarity. The rhythm of “Motu proprio” (on his own impulse) seemed to reflect on the rhythm of Dave Brubeck’s “Blue Rondo à la Turk,” while “Mariposa” (butterfly) offered up a slight suggestion of “Là ci darem la mano,” the seduction duet from Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s K. 527 opera Don Giovanni. The program concluded with two pieces inspired by Francis of Assisi based on canticles to the wind and the stars.

Ceccomori introduced “Pwyll” by explaining that its composer, Giacinto Scelsi, was interested in “the sound inside of the sound.” This provided the best opportunity to appreciate the breadth of sonorities that Ceccomori could elicit from his instrument. (In that regard Ceccomori’s own short piece about wind offered an engaging study of the interplay between the sounds of the flute and the sounds of the breath “behind” the making of those flute sounds.)

This attention to the underlying properties of sound itself were also evident in Luciano Chessa’s “Riflesso” (reflection), which was given its premiere performance. There may well have been a double meaning in this title. On the one hand the music seems to be reflecting on the nature of music-making itself. However, there were also suggestions that the sounds themselves emerged from the reflective properties of breath going across the mouthpiece and into the instrument’s tube. Given Chessa’s interest in philosophy, it would not be surprising to encounter this merging of physics and metaphysics in one of his compositions.

More representational was Aldo Brizzi’s “Studio per Krishna,” which was written for Ceccomori. Krishna is often depicted playing the flute:



Indeed, the flute often figures significantly in the stories of his wooing the milkmaid Radha. As was the case with “Mariposa,” the imaginative listener would have no trouble finding hints of seduction behind this depiction of Krishna playing his favored instrument.

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Andrea Ceccomori will Give a Solo Flute Recital at IIC

The next concert to be hosted by the Italian Cultural Institute (Istituto Italiano de Cultura, IIC) will take place at the beginning of next month. Past offerings have included solo recitals for piano and violin and a string quartet program. The next one will be another solo recital, this time by flutist Andrea Ceccomori. The program will reflect on both the distant and the recent past.

The composer from the “most distant” past will be Georg Philipp Telemann with a performance of one of his fantasias for solo flute. Ceccomori will play his own “Bachiana,” which will present his perspective on the music of Johann Sebastian Bach. He will also play several other works of his own composition. The other composers included on the program will be Giacinto Scelsi (“Pwyll”), Aldo Brizzi (“Studio per Krishna”), and local composer Luciano Chessa (“Riflesso”).

This concert will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 4, and is expected to last for about two hours. IIC is located in the Civic Center at 601 Van Ness Avenue. Admission is free, but registration is required to assure having a place. IIC has created a registration page specific for this event. Anyone who registers may also add the names of a maximum of two additional guests. Those wishing further information may call IIC at 415-788-7142.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Next Season at Symphony

As I observed last month, David Gockley has planned the 2009–10 season of the San Francisco Opera in a way that shows sensible respect for the current economic hard times, thus reflecting the same strategy that can be observed at London's Royal Opera House. The 2009–10 schedule for the San Francisco Symphony has now been released; and I have to confess that it seems more than a bit more ambitious and risky, particularly for a performing ensemble that has to come up with a new program almost every week over approximately a ten-month period. I have now made my first pass through this list and would like to highlight (with some annotation) some of the events that are likely to be the most interesting and/or satisfying. This list will be nothing more than highly subjective first impressions, so I welcome any points of view that either challenge or support it. First of all, here is the clarification about place and time:

All events are in Davies Symphony Hall except where indicated [the Flint Center being in Silicon Valley]; (m) denotes matinee.

Not counting the material for the opening gala, Gustav Mahler will lead the way at the beginning of the new season:

Sept. 16, 17, 19, 20 (m) -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor; Susan Graham, mezzo-soprano. Mahler: "Rückert-Lieder," Symphony No. 1.

Sept. 23, 24, 25, 26 -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor and piano; Thomas Hampson, baritone. Mahler: "Origins and Legacies," including "Songs of a Wayfarer," Piano Quartet, selections from Symphonies 2, 3 and 7, early songs and Scherzo from Hans Rott's Symphony in E Major.

Sept. 30, Oct. 1, 2, 3 -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor. Scelsi: "Hymnos"; Mahler: Symphony No. 5.

This should make for an interesting approach to learning how to listen to Mahler. I am not, as a rule, particularly big on offering excerpts; but, as I hope my writing has made clear, I feel very strongly about the idea of "listening in context." Thus, I am all for providing context through a project like the "Origins and Legacies" program that Thomas has conceived. My knowledge of Rott comes entirely from Henry-Louis de La Grange's massive Mahler biography. Rott was a fellow student at the Vienna Conservatory. De La Grange introduces him to the reader in conjunction with a profile of the Conservatory's director, Josef Hellmesberger, Sr. Here are two sentences that set the context:

This confirmed traditionalist [Hellmesberger] was, needless to say, extremely distressed by the turbulence of such young students as Hugo Wolf, Hans Rott, and Mahler. The last mentioned was often reprimanded for having "behaved insubordinately," and, as for Wolf, he was dismissed outright in March 1877 for breaking one of the rules.

In that respect I also took interest in the idea of coupling Mahler's fifth symphony with a 1963 composition by Giacinto Scelsi, who never seemed to be "distressed" by turbulence in his own approach to composition.

Oct. 22, 23, 24 -

Osmo Vänskä, conductor; Yundi Li, piano. John Adams: "Slonimsky's Earbox"; Tchaikovsky: Piano Concerto No. 1; Dvorák: Symphony No. 7.

Oct. 28, 30 (Friday 6.5), 31 (Flint) -

Osmo Vänskä, conductor; Vadim Repin, violin. Aulis Sallinen: Symphony No. 1; Sibelius: Violin Concerto; Beethoven: "Coriolan" Overture, Symphony No. 8.

The last time Vänskä came to Davies, I was delighted to experience an understanding that was as adept with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart as it was with his fellow Finns, both the more traditional Jean Sibelius and the contemporary Kalevi Aho. This time he will undertake a broader repertoire that will again recognize Sibelius and couple him with Sallinen. Given his versatility, it will also be interesting to hear the approach he takes to Adams.

Nov. 27, 28, 29 (m) -

Ragnar Bohlin, conductor; Malin Christensson, soprano; Marie-Nicole Lemieux, contralto; Lothar Odinius, tenor; Anders Larsson, baritone; San Francisco Symphony Chorus; Ragnar Bohlin, director. Bach: "Christmas Oratorio."

This work is basically a cycle of six cantatas for Advent services, and it is a pity that it is not performed more often. The Symphony has a rather good track record for summoning the proper modern-instrument resources for performing Johann Sebastian Bach; and I was certainly happy when I heard the Chorus sang the BWV 232 mass setting in B minor several years ago. This will also be a good opportunity to become more familiar with Bohlin's conducting.

Dec. 9, 10 (m), 11, 12 -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor; Emanuel Ax, piano. Schubert/Webern: "German Dances"; Beethoven: Piano Concerto No. 4; Webern: Symphony; Beethoven: Symphony No. 5.

This may well turn out to be the most interesting program of the entire season by virtue of the decision to couple Ludwig van Beethoven at his most "monumental" with Anton Webern in his capacities as both orchestrator and composer. As is clear from his "Path to the New Music" lectures, Webern attached great importance to the ability to listen to Beethoven with an acutely understanding ear; and he may well have acquired that priority from his teacher Arnold Schoenberg, whose Fundamentals of Musical Composition draws so heavily on Beethoven for examples that the editors included the following Explanatory Note:

All citations of musical literature which do not specify the composer refer to works by Beethoven.

Placing Webern's symphony between two works of Beethoven should provide an opportunity for our understanding of Beethoven to influence our understanding of Webern and vice versa.

Feb. 18 (m), 19, 20 -

Herbert Blomstedt, conductor; Michael Grebanier, cello. Haydn: Cello Concerto No. 1; Beethoven: Symphony No. 3, "Eroica."

Feb. 24, 25 (m), 26 -

Herbert Blomstedt, conductor; Mozart: Symphony No. 36, "Linz"; Bruckner: Symphony No. 6.

Blomstedt's visits are always interesting (usually as much to Symphony members as to the audience). Having experienced Kurt Masur's approach to Anton Bruckner, I welcome the opportunity to compare it with Blomstedt's. Furthermore, now that Thomas has demonstrated his own chops for the "Eroica," Blomstedt's reading should make for a fascinating comparison.

March 11, 12 (Friday 6.5), 13, 14 (m) -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor; Laura Claycomb, soprano; Katarina Karnéus, mezzo-soprano; San Francisco Symphony Chorus; Ragnar Bohlin, director. Mahler: Symphony No. 2, "Resurrection."

This is another work that deserves regular listening; and Thomas always comes back to previously-performed works with new perspectives.

June 17, 18, 19 -

Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor and piano; Yuja Wang, piano. Poulenc: Sonata for Piano Four Hands; Stravinsky: Capriccio for Piano and Orchestra; Villa-Lobos: "Bachianas Brasileiras" No. 9; Ravel: Piano Concerto for the Left Hand; Stravinsky: "The Rite of Spring."

This is such a fascinating assortment that I am really intrigued as to how it will come together as an entire program. It will also provide the opportunity to hear Wang in three different contexts, which is rare for a visiting soloist. I have to confess that The Rite of Spring is one of the first works I heard Thomas conduct after I moved to the Bay Area, and it was one of my most memorable experiences of the work. It is hard for me to resist the opportunity to hear him approach to work again.

Among the "special events," one event stands out among all the others:

Nov. 20-21 -

Berlin Philharmonic, conducted by Simon Rattle. 11/21: Brahms/Schoenberg: Piano Quartet No. 1; Brahms: Symphony No. 1. 11/22: Wagner: Prelude to Act I of "Die Meistersinger"; Schoenberg: Chamber Symphony No. 1; Brahms: Symphony No. 2.

As I have frequently observed, there is much to be said for the Brahms-Schoenberg connection. However, Richard Wagner is usually out of place in such a context. It will be interesting to see what Rattle does to present his music as a "prelude" to Schoenberg's chamber symphony, rather than the opera for which it was intended.

The other important visit will take place under the "Great Performers Series:"

May 10 & 11 -

Los Angeles Philharmonic; Gustavo Dudamel, conductor; Jean-Yves Thibaudet, piano. 5/10: John Adams: "City Noir"; Mahler: Symphony No. 1. 5/11: Bernstein: Symphony No. 2, "The Age of Anxiety"; Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 6, "Pathétique.

Having heard Dudamel conduct the San Francisco Symphony, I now very much want to hear him with his "home base." I am particularly interested to hear how he will bring Mahler to "Michael's house." Myung-Whun Chung did this in January of 2008 with the same symphony; and he summoned a compelling performance through what I called "the musical version of stare decisis," all the more interesting because he had applied the same strategy to Olivier Messiaen in the first half of his program. Coupling Mahler with Adams should make for a markedly different context, and I am curious as to how Mahler will fare through this programming decision.

As I wrote in introducing this selection, these choices are all products of the arbitrariness of my personal taste. They all have the potential to expand our capacity for being better listeners, but I have every reason to believe that the same can be said of the concerts I did not include in my list. We all have every reason to look forward to the coming season in its entirety.